How funny ... yesterday I wrote about feeling someone sending me love. This morning, I feel someone's anger. I'm pretty sure whose it is, too. Which is fine. We needed to clear it from our relationship. Lest we forget, I'm well aware that "anger is always of the ego." That said ... as a woman becomes more congruent and her standard for how she's going to be treated moves progressively upward, sometimes anger is an intermediate phase on the way up the feelings ladder. It's not vengeful anger, it's more like "this is bullshit, and I'm not going to take it anymore" kind of anger.
Speaking of anger, I enjoyed Rori's post today about "friends with benefits," an arrangement that may work for some people but that I personally want no part of in my life because it feels awful. I encourage women to be very clear about what they want and don't want with men, and to communicate clear "nos" to what they don't want.
********************************
Now ... on to today's report. So back in early March, I attended Mehow's 10SSA SuperConference. 10SSA, for those who are not familiar, stands for "10 second sexual attraction." The conference was packed, in part because it had both regular students and guys from Mehow's instructor program.
Through no fault of Mehow's, I ended up being a little less present for that weekend than I have for other conferences. This was because I lost my wallet on the airplane and arrived in Vegas with one dollar to my name, no credit cards, nothing. After having the taxi driver threaten to call the police and a big drama just to get a hotel room for the night, I was a little preoccupied and basically out of commission until my friend Matrix Guy had the brilliant idea of taking a personal check down to the casino. I had forgotten that, this being Vegas, and I being in a casino ... OF COURSE they would find a way to get me cash. Lol :-)
There's a happy ending to this story, for those of you who think there are no honest people in the world. After I got back to San Francisco, Southwest Airlines called to let me know that they not only had my wallet, but also that it had all the cash still in it. Talk about good karma :-) I do my best to be honest with people, and I find that this creates amazing amounts of good karma coming right back at me.
So back to the conference ... here are some things I really liked:
* First of all, I really like Mehow's book, which is entitled, not surprisingly, Ten Second Sexual Attraction. It's a real book, for those who are weary of e-books (which I am, so am considering converting my upcoming e-book into a series of videos instead). Mehow's book is well-organized, easy-to-read with big print, and (appropriately) physically attractive. He has a good mix of theory and actual samples of dialogue.
One of my favorite lines in the whole book is in the section on Friends: "If you have men in your life that aren't on a path to enlightenment you will have to let them go and find new ones. Note that very few men are on the path to enlightenment." What I love about this is Mehow's recognition that this whole "seduction" business is really a path to enlightenment (which only a few people seem to recognize), but he just slides it into the middle of the book with no fanfare. Nice.
* The speakers I saw were great. DJ Fuji always does a nice job. I also got to see El Topo and Kamouflage speak for the first time. They were all great. I missed a lot of the other speakers though, due to the wallet issue and timing of airplane flights.
* Mehow's introduction used quite a bit of actual video footage in which he was picking up on an actual girl. The footage was effective and made the presentation more lively. I also like that Mehow likes sassy girls! ;-) Not only that, he said "I'm bored of hot girls." Amen. I love it when a guy is evolved enough to recognize that what really intrigues him about a woman longer term has nothing to do with looks.
* One of my favorite aspects of the SuperConference is that Mehow and the other instructors actually took the guys out. Frankly, I've had enough of seminars with gurus talk talk talking. I would like to see way more live action cuz I think guys learn better that way. Plus, the instructors need to walk their talk.
So Mehow set up a private room with bottle service at one of the clubs, and this ended up giving the guys a fun home base for attracting women. Meanwhile, the instructors were out on the dance floor with the guys helping them open sets. In my view, this is the way the business should be run. A bunch of the guys ended up having success with women THAT night. Including a few lays.
Business-wise, I also want to put in a plug for Mehow's win/win attitude. He seems to be one of the few in the business who has recognized that we all achieve more success by helping each other (linking each other's blogs, sharing articles, inviting each other to events, etc.). I'd like to see more of that attitude prevailing in the community at large.
Ok, I'm out of time for now ... see you all soon.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
28 comments:
I'm quite schoked about your judgementalism on open relationships you say it feels "Awful"???!!!.
I agree that you have the right to choose your type of relationships and I'm not here to advocate open relatioships but trust me its not because you didn't choose a style of living then it becomes "awful" that is precisely the kind of mentality i always try get away from. Even worse some people see it as a win/lose arrangement due to "manipulation"; THIS.... is awful and i hope you grow past this judgmentalism.
much love.
“It's not vengeful anger, it's more like "this is bullshit, and I'm not going to take it anymore" kind of anger.”
Mhm. There can be compassionate anger & other kinds of worthwhile more-healthy ego anger. I’ve heard that as we transcend where we’re at and grow to include more of what we can be, it also means that regarding some things, it’s going to be “transcend and exclude.”
Have you ever seen Saul Williams performing his piece “Telegram”? “You have the right to remain silent. You have the right to remain silent. You have the right to remain silent, and maybe you should have, before your bullshit manifested.” This comes into my memory, when I read this post.
Loved that little post on feeling loved, btw.
hi ans,
thanks for your comment.
I'm not judging it by saying it feels awful. I'm telling you how it feels to me. Whatever other people want to do is fine. To me, it feels awful. So I don't do it. And there are a lot of women who do it even though it doesn't feel good to them either. That doesn't mean it's inherently "bad," it means it's something I'm not interested in.
Erika, do you feel what you would call jealously and/or possessiveness very keenly in your life? At the point you're at now? And if not, did you once? You say that "friends with benefits" situations feel awful -- for the reasons you've already stated: a lack of emotional congruence, the inherent indecision, etc. What I want to know is this: do the high-flying words above feel the same to you as what the "normal" relationship crowd calls possessiveness?
You're on record, at least in the time before your sexual adventures, as having no interest in "getting" the guy. Does sex change your perspective on this?
And, for the complement to this question, and the reason for my self-interest in the whole affair: how do you react to possessive feelings from the men in your life? Considering the view of relationships I'm garnering from ACIM and your posts, you believe, at least in theory, in a world without the desire to own another person or use them to fulfill your needs. It's true -- in that form, such feelings only lead to pain.
But you say of womankind, "We want to be taken." You say that a guy needs to take responsibility for the interaction, lead, and be shameless in his desire for you. Tenmagnet said the same thing. See the line somewhere in the middle of that link about fucking "her with the jealous intent to ruin her for all other men."
What's the belief system that ties this all together? What's up with wanting to be possessed, and to have a relationship, but not to have a possessive relationship? Is it a role-play? I like to think it goes deeper than that, for both the woman and the man. If I'm with a high self-esteem woman, and when we're together, I'm providing a space for her to be feminine, and she for me to be masculine, without judgments or agendas -- am I doing her a disservice by not trying for a deeper relationship? Not expressing jealousy when she fucks another man (assuming I don't feel such jealousy)? Am I being wishy-washy? How -could- I introduce that commitment to the relationship without turning her into a tool that I use to satisfy my needs? Doesn't she deserve better than that?
I jumped too soon to conclusions then.
I'll remember to always take your posts in context; as for my comment, i lived in an environement where anything a girl does equates "she's a slut" (wearing a mini-skirt, talking to a stranger etc..) evryone is hard headed and that pisses me off a lot so that's why i got agressive so fast.
much love.
Unrelated to your above blog-post...Did you have any parental issues? I did, I'd like to see how you dealt with them if you did have any.
Mehow said "I'm bored of hot girls!"
Say, what???
Only GAY guys are bored of hot girls.
No one....NO ONE (straight) gets tired of girls like this - http://hotcelebrity.name/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/cindy-crawford-picture-1.jpg
And she's old now too!
Mehow has already been forced to spend a LOT of time rebutting that gay rep because of his voice/mannerisms on early PUA videos.
Why he would say something THAT STUPID may seem incredulous to some who wonder what would make him open up that can of worms again.
But the answer is simple: HE CAN'T GET HOT GIRLS.
Watch his videos, you'll see that as he's gaming some plump nasty HO, tons of SUPER HOT girls, at the SAME club, just walk on by.
Saying "I'm bored with hot girls" is the most SOUR GRAPES line I've heard.
He likes 'sassy' girls because he's NOT a man and wants DOMINANT women. Typical feminist male.
REAL ladies men like Big Daddy - The Greatest Ladies Man on Earth - want SWEET AND SUBMISSIVE women.
Why? It's a perfect match for a DOMINANANT & Authoritative man.
That's how it works in REAL life.
So what does that say about Mehow and his merry band of so-called PUA's?
Hmmmmm....
Big Daddy
Making it Plain
PS From a selfish standpoint, Mehow's inadequacies are actually good for Big Daddy. Like they say about actual gay guys - 'No problem! More chicks for the rest of us!' haha
But, I KNOW Mehow's methods work. But they primarily work on unattractive chicks. The one time I REALLY tried it, I pulled a chick that same night. A heavy one. haha
"So Mehow set up a private room with bottle service at one of the clubs"
Mehow almost ALWAYS does this when he goes 'gaming.'
At a cost of a COUPLE HUNDRED BUCKS A NIGHT.
Funny, he never mentions that dishing out a couple bills is PART of his 'Gaming Process.' haha
You know in Vegas, for just the cost of bottle service, you could get a VERY FINE HOOKER via Craigslist, right?
He should have foregone the bottle service and held a Craiglist Raffle. haha
That way at least ONE guy would have gotten laid at his...er...SUPER conference of Pick Up Artists! haha
And, what's worse, even with this RIDICULOUS bottle service gambit, his blog that blows features videos of him MAKING EXCUSE AFTER EXCUSE for why no one could get any girls.
I'm not kidding. Go there right now, it's entry 116.
He's got this long song and dance about 'logistics' and how, if it wasn't for logisitics, one of his students might have found HIS WIFE!!!
I am not making this up. I swear! haha
Oh well, like I've told you many times, If you're STUPID enough to pay for one of these so-called PUA's courses, you're probably stupid enough to believe the UTTER BULL$HIT they spit.
Remember, these guys ARE skilled seduction artists.
The only problem? It's THE GUYS they are seducing.
Seducing them into paying THOUSANDS of $$ for worthless bootcamps and glossy material that will BARELY help them at all.
I have no problem with it. It serves these guys right. A lot of his 'clients' are 35-55 yr old men wanting to learn how to pick up 18 yr old girls. These guys deserve Mehow!
lol
Big Daddy
The Greatest Ladies Man on Earth
I'll teach you how REAL ladies men operate - For Free!
PS Funny...'Logistics' never stopped Big Daddy from getting with girls. If a girl likes you, she'll MAKE the logistics work!!!
Hmm. "sweet and submissive" isn't really my thing either, Big Daddy.
On the other hand, quirky and compassionate can wrap me up and take me home.
Different strokes for different folks, I guess.
"Sweet and submissive" isn't really my thing ...Quirky and compassionate can wrap me up and take me home."
Yeah...I hear that.
A lot of it IS personal preference. My TWO closest buddies want someone more assertive. They're FAR from feminists. Just a personality match.
But I do think that guys who are turned on by the real assertive, sassy, even Bitchy girls have issues.
Mystery likes the bratty type and, if you've read the game, you KNOW he at least had some major 'Daddy Issues.'
I don't say that with glee. I hope he has since worked things out.
But, you'd be surprised how much of who you are is a function of how you negotiated your relationship with your parents or parental figures.
And it carries over into pickup.
You may not even know why you like a certain type, but it often has deep significance.
I think if you like sweet submissive types, it generally means you are the agressive dominant type that wants to handle things and have her there for supporty and affection.
That's a fairly standard relationship motif that goes back centuries.
True, there are other arrangements that work just as well.
But sorry, hooking up w/ball busting women does NOT make for a good relationship. And that's what sassy really means.
It's like the guy almost wants the woman to be the God figure in his life...to tell him how bad he is. It's one step away from asking her to dress up like the principal and beat him with coat hanger. haha You know - how those REAL powerful bankers and Wall Street players sometimes swing. lol
So yeah, I think it's something to take a look at.
In fact, it's MUCH EASIER early on for a guy to just let his woman run things.
But it comes at a VERY HIGH long term price...
Your manhood.
And, once you give that away...you're SCREWED.
And I mean that metaphorically...only! haha
Big Daddy
The Greatest Ladies Man on Earth
As a woman who loves chivalry, I personally don't see anything wrong with getting bottle service. If a guy can afford it, or if it's a communal thing where a bunch of people put money in, it adds to the festive mood and creates a nice cozy space to spend some time and get to know people. Providing these things is, to me, very congruent with the essence of being a man.
I also disagree about the "sassy" thing. "Sassy" does not mean un-feminine. It means flirtatious and unattached to the outcome. It is often a natural side effect of a woman being internally validated and happy with her life.
If I have lots of money, I want to share it with friends and have fun. What's wrong with bottle service? What, are you in this PUA stuff to learn how to become cheap and spartan? Life is to be enjoyed; and health experts say that it's not good to drink alone anyway.
What I like most about this discussion is the diversity of opinions both in terms of what people value and what they want.
I have no doubt that everyone here knows what they're talking about--yet they come to radically different conclusions.
Erika values chivalry; BD likes submissive; Mehow likes sassy; I get weak in the knees over expressiveness and kind-heartedness.
Similarly, Real Dan and Erika like the bottle service idea for different reasons; Big Daddy seems to feel it's cheating or at least a crutch; I can see the merit in it, but for me the thrill of doing this is going in with no bottle service, no social proof, and trying to make a connection.
It makes for a much richer experience than the cookie-cutter A then B then C attitude that used to prevail when talking about this stuff.
Plus, I find I learn way more from people who disagree with me.
-Unreal Dan
Big Daddy Responds:
Erica, you're missing the point.
NO WHERE in his books does Mehow tell his followers that a SIGNIFICANT part of his game is LURING women to some private party room with Bottle Service costing a couple hundred bucks an evening.
But, the DIRTY little secret is that this is a BIG part of his game.
The fact that it's affordable to some, you personally like it because you think it demonstrates chivalry & a festive, cozy atmosphere along with a way for guys to pitch in to form a Bottle Commune is ALL BESIDES THE POINT.
Dan, pretty much same to you only worse. Your comments - drinking alone is not as healty, you want to spread the wealth Obama-style haha, and it proves you're not a cheapskate are not only besides the point...THEY ARE LAME excuses.
Mehow claims his books are THE GREATEST pick up books in the world. I'm not kidding. It's in his latest video posted on his blog he thinks he banned me from. haha. The reason he purportedly banned me (his words) was because I was going around saying I was the greatest ladies man in the world. Hmmm...apparently that ship was only big enough for ONE captain. haha No probs but it shows his dishonesty. He banned me then...er...borrowed...my bravado.
Of course it sounds tinny when he says it as he does NOT have the goods that Big Daddy has.
But even worse is that his materials FAIL to mention this EXHORBITANT bottle service gambit that he uses to get women.
If you're a true ladies man, you don't need bottle service to get with women. And, if you just want to enjoy the Bottle Service experience as you both so artfully advanced, there's a time for that. But he's USING IT AS A CENTRAL PART OF HIS GAME TO ISOLATE WOMEN.
That IS cheating. That's not game and it's dishonest.
LIke I said, if you're pick up budget is 2 bills before you even get started, just call CraigsList. I GUARANTEE you'll get laid. And the STD weather report is no better or worse than for the girls Mehow is likely to game. haha
So yeah, it's an outrage that he writes these books that DON'T MENTION a word of them or suggest it's all about creating value velocity with his words when it turns out he's spending HUNDREDS.
My ave budget for hooking up w/a brand new girl is about $5 max for coffee. That's it. And that's MAX.
And yes I do PRIDE myself on that.
Why? Cause if girls like you, they'll spend $$ on YOU.
That's part of being the Greatest Ladies Man on Earth.
To call me a cheapskate is just a pathetic attempt at changing the subject it's not worth dignifying.
And I don't ever buy them drinks in fact I don't even want them tipsy. I want them COMPLETELY SOBER the whole time they're getting Big Daddy'd. Whooooooooo!!
Contrast that with these so-called PUA's who ply them w/alcohol, use what they call 'social game' which is nothing more than Middle School Status Lures that cost hundreds of dollars per night.
I walk into a venue, spit a little game, find a girl that's interested and leave with her to go get coffee or hang out. And she winds up getting Big Daddy'd.
I tell her right up front I don't talk on the phone. She can txt and I usually will respond (don't want to be rude. haha) They text me and set up a date at THEIR house to watch DVD's or whatever. I may spend a couple more bucks while they are buying me dinner, making me homemade Chai etc.
After that, they pay for EVERYTHING.
And if Mehow really wasn't using Bottle Service as a CENTRAL part of his game, how come he's ALWAYS doing it? Heck if you just want to share your good fortune with your buddies, why are you doing it with girls you JUST MET THAT NIGHT and your only objective is to bed them?
Do you see the contrast?
Good. I'm glad I was able to make it plain...
Is it any wonder that Big Daddy is The Greatest Ladies Man on Earth?
Whooooo!!!
Big Daddy
"I also disagree about the "sassy" thing. "Sassy" does not mean un-feminine. It means flirtatious and unattached to the outcome. It is often a natural side effect of a woman being internally validated and happy with her life."
Erica,
You may have a stronger point here. I have a PERSONAL preference for what we used to call the Sweet & Submissive types. You know...women that just go along with your plans. They are MAGNETICALLY drawn to POWERFUL men like Big Daddy.
Yeah, I also draw the sassy ball buster types whom you so charitibly defend as merely "unattached to the outcome."
But, I really have no use for them. They DON'T make for good relationship partners. I FUNDAMENTALLY disagree that this is evidence of internal happiness. Just the opposite. I do think it's cute, charming and even NECESSARY when they first meet you. It's part of the 'sizing up' process and to see how quick you are on your feet.
That, I'm cool with.
After that? It's just another pathology.
And the fact that SO many guys actually PREFER women like that means they want the women to have the balls.
It's an adaptive natural selection choice I guess, since so many more women seem to be like that. But, for many it's just an act. I can't tell you how many women I know that have been RIPPED TO SHREDS behind the scenes by their supposed female friends for DARING to be submissive to some guy.
Yeah, Big Daddy learned his game MORE from women than from men which is why he is SO lethal.
But this begs the question.. if being sassy is such a 'natural side effect' why is it ENFORCED by the pecking order in such draconian terms?
The answer is simple. It's feminisim plain and simple.
Mehow and many other weak men are feminists.
Now, you may be too. Probably are. And I respect your choice.
But I DETEST FEMINISM as does any REAL man because, no matter how hard you try to fit that square dildo in to the oval opening....
....it never quite fits properly.
Big Daddy
He knows...
To *Unreal* Dan,
OMG, LMAO. Thank you for that! :-)
Thanks Unreal Dan. For the record I believe you are as real as me. We both keeps it real.
"If you're a true ladies man, you don't need bottle service to get with women."
You don't NEED socks, either, but you wear them. There's no reason to go around making labels; there's no test you pass where they go "here's your ladies' man license, go get em tiger"
I should be able to pick up chicks whether or not I'm in the mood to pick up the tab. Either one should be fine.
"There's no test you pass where they go "here's your ladies' man license"
Fair enough. I can see what that can quickly go Reductio ad absurdum.
I'll just leave it like this:
My contention has been that the so-called PUA's (and I go after the BEST OF BREED like Mystery and Mehow, cause the others are just clones) are only good at seducing MEN.
That's where their strength lies.
Mystery used to harp so much on his bull$hit natural selection theories that at one time I wondered if he just used pick up for a platform to preach that cockamamie nonesense. Thankfully it seems his VH1 producers told him to cut the crap and focus on the sizzle. haha
Both Mystery and Mehow CAN get girls. Messed up girls. Fat girls. Mediocre girls. But they CAN get them. You know Mystery became SUICIDAL over a break up with a girl, right?
So much so, that he had to be INSTITUTIONALIZED.
Now his enablers have all kinds of excuses to explain that away.
But, that kind of makes my point for me.
These guys are WIZARDS at seducing GUYS.
Seducing them into spending THOUSANDS of dollars on relatively USELESS (all depending) 'bootcamps', 'superconferences' and glossy covered faux army fatigue manuals.
And then in a manner that would make the Stockholm Kidnappers say 'how do they DO that' gets these guys who STILL have not gotten laid to carry their water for them.
Now THAT'S seduction.
Wrong gender. But seduction nonetheless. haha
So, if you want to call Mystery and Mehow Seduction Masters, I'll be the first to buy the T-shirt.
But they can't get women. Qlty women anyway. Sorry.
And, if your 'game' includes having to spend $200+ on bottle service, exactly what kind of game is it?
And we KNOW he relies on it, since he ALWAYS does this ANYTIME he takes his acolytes out 'sarging.' And even THEN 90% of them don't get laid.
Why? Well according to Mehow...logistics!
Here's a guy seducing other men into flying to Vegas, spending THOUSANDS of dollars, BUYING them Bottle Service and then explaining the REAL reason they can't get nooky is cause of....LOGISTICS??
Hahahahahahahaaa. I swear I am NOT making this stuff up. No one would believe me if I did!
Of course there are things Big Daddy uses to complement his natural appeal. I have a nice car, I've owned a business since I was in middle school, I project an aura of accomplishment. And I use them all, as needed, from time to time, mainly as confirming elements so the girl feels she made the right choice. But she has NO IDEA about all this when we first meet. And it stands to reason I'd be successful.
Heck if you can get girls like Big Daddy, you can DO anything.
But, if you have to teach how to get girls to make money...then you know NEITHER.
Anyway, those nice touches are not CENTRAL parts of my game. Besides, that's just who I am. Plus, there are COUNTLESS guys FAR more accomplished that couldn't game their way out of a wet Vista shrinkrap. Hint...hint. haha
Your point about socks is well taken. But, if you have to have a $200 'pr of sox' to get chicks just about EVERY TIME you go out as does Mehow, then you have a problem.
And Mehow has a problem.
And the more strenuously his acolytes attempt spin this OBVIOUS TO ANYONE WITH A KERNEL OF COMMONSENSE reality, the less credibility they have.
Dan, this is not the same as "You like country bars- I like techno.'
This is a guy who advises going out MULTIPLE times a week which would then result in spending a FORTUNE as PART of his game. For what? To bone a couple drunken pudgy floozies?
Please.
Sorry, tis just not game. There...I said it.
Big Daddy
*And I didn't even mention how Mehow secretly uses 'I'm a Hollywood so and so' as a central part of his game either. Style as well...ALL the time. Again, that's cool since that's part of what they do. But does he teach his followers how crucial that is to his...er...game?
Have the spam filters failed on the comments section for this blog?
I've got no desire to read Big Daddy's narcissistic and self-promotional rants.
One less reason for me to visit this blog.
Dear Anonymous,
(I'm guessing you are the same Anonymous as was upset about my return to abstinence.)
Admittedly, Big Daddy became quite fervent in his commentary over the past couple of days. Perhaps this was a combination of me posting about abstinence and Mehow in the same week, lol.
But he has been including substance and sincere perspectives in his posts, so he has just as much place on this blog as anyone else.
BD is a human being just like the rest of us.
Love,
Erika
Erika, there was a workshop after the conference... Mehow wasn't doing charity work, his students were paying big money to go out with him and his instructors at night.
Btw, Mehow doesn't always pay for a table and bottle service. He does that when he's shooting and for special occasions. Other than that, he's sarging without any table... so he can do it. But guys will always find something negative about gurus. Like people saying that Mystery could only pickup with extravagant clothes and magic. He proved them wrong. Same thing here, Mehow doesn't need a table.
Don't push it though, Big Daddy ;-)
Stick with the substance please.
@ Anonymous (5:08 pm 4/10) - yes, I'm well aware that Mehow doesn't need bottle service, and I'm also well aware that bottle service alone will not get a guy laid. Not even close.
I'm not upset with your decision to return to abstinence.
What bothers me are your flawed justifications for doing so.
Lol :-) I see. And what would be "unflawed" justifications for doing so?
I feel overwhelmed right now. I'm going out to the woods for mountain biking. Would love to hear your thoughts.
Someone foolish enough to BELIEVE the stuff PUA's spit, tried out this line on Erica: "What bothers me are your flawed justifications for (waiting until marriage.)"
Erika hit it out of the park - like any decent chick would....
"...And just what would be "unflawed" justifications for doing so?"
Perfect! lol
But, Erica...
You're RUINING the fantasy for these guys.
You're supposed to say...
"You know, I never thought of it that way. Let's F--K!"
At least that's how it happens in all the MASF LR's.
haha
Big Daddy
So glad a woman is finally bold and articulate enough to confirm what I told you guys a long time ago. These PUA's don't know JACK about Jill. IF they are that good, how come the ONE groupie they had in their midst has turned into a NUN??
Hmmmm...
All this ranting and no one has mentioned the fact that many of Mehow's customers have been waiting for products for months. And now the 10SSA seems to be more of the same sell a product that you don't have produced yet. Just read some to the comments on his blog
First of all, Erika nice meeting you @ the Super Conference. I was the guy who sat @ the back and randomly started talking to you the first day. BTW, I was not trying to pick you up lol. Anyways I would like to address the Anonymous poster who was bashing Mehow.
"I KNOW Mehow's methods work. But they primarily work on unattractive chicks"
Not true, not true @ all. I've seen many people using MEhow's method to pull hot chicks, including me. I took infield in Vegas both nights. I pulled a chick to my hotel room the first night. The second night, I almost pulled a really hot asian chick but her friends came and pulled her away from me. The logistics comments he made were referring to me. I could have never done the things that I do now infield regularly if it weren't for Mehow. I am no master PUA but I have only been in the game for a short while and have seen some decent results.
"And, what's worse, even with this RIDICULOUS bottle service gambit, his blog that blows features videos of him MAKING EXCUSE AFTER EXCUSE for why no one could get any girls."
Not true. 2/3 of the guys I shared hotel rooms with both got same night lays in Vegas. Will the first night of infield and Daniel on the second. Daniel banged a chick in the bathtub and bathroom counter while me and 2 other guys were pretending to be sleep. He then shared the bed with me and his "new friend". What type of "normal" guy do you know could get away with that??
"He's got this long song and dance about 'logistics' and how, if it wasn't for logisitics, one of his students might have found HIS WIFE!!!"
Once again, he was referring to me. I am still in contact with this girl over facebook and we chat on the regular. Unfortunately we live on seperate coasts and I won't probably see her for a while. She was a beautiful and awesome chick that I would have never been to attract without becoming a PUA. Logistics only screwed me over because I wasn't experienced on how to handle the specific situation...now I know...thanks to Mehow.
"NO WHERE in his books does Mehow tell his followers that a SIGNIFICANT part of his game is LURING women to some private party room with Bottle Service costing a couple hundred bucks an evening."
To be quite honest with you, we rarely used the bottle service room you are referring to. It was nice to have but we had to go get ours. It wasn't like the chicks just flocked to our table. We had to go out in the crowded venue and game. Something most people not in the community don't have the balls to do.
"My ave budget for hooking up w/a brand new girl is about $5 max for coffee. That's it. And that's MAX."
Hey guess what. SOme nights I go out and don't even spend that. I go out 3-4 nights a week and can't afford to spend money on alcohol all the time. When I'm in my hometown, I am not afforded the luxury of "cheating" and a funny thing happens...I still get results. Oh did I mention that I am a fucking security guard, make only $50,000 a year, never finished college,drive a 98' Camry, and have still attracted and abundance of quality women in my life since I started gaming? So much for your theories...
Post a Comment